1953 Buick 40 vs. 1996 Fiat Siena
To start off, 1996 Fiat Siena is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,315 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Buick 40 (123 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Siena. (51 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Siena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Buick 40 weights approximately 365 kg more than 1996 Fiat Siena. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Buick 40 (304 Nm) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Fiat Siena. (200 Nm). This means 1953 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Fiat Siena.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Buick 40 | 1996 Fiat Siena | |
Make | Buick | Fiat |
Model | 40 | Siena |
Year Released | 1953 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4315 cc | 1910 cc |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 304 Nm | 200 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 1300 kg |