1953 Buick 40 vs. 2000 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2000 Ford Falcon is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,315 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Falcon (220 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1953 Buick 40. (123 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1953 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Buick 40 weights approximately 147 kg more than 2000 Ford Falcon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Buick 40. (304 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Buick 40 | 2000 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | 40 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1953 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4315 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 304 Nm | 357 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.9 mm | 92.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 99.3 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 1518 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2800 mm |