1953 Buick 40 vs. 2002 Ford F-150
To start off, 2002 Ford F-150 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,315 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford F-150 (202 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1953 Buick 40. (123 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1953 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford F-150 weights approximately 410 kg more than 1953 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford F-150 (339 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Buick 40. (304 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2002 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Buick 40 | 2002 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | 40 | F-150 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4315 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 304 Nm | 339 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 2075 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 2000 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 3050 mm |