1953 Buick 40 vs. 2005 Hyundai Matrix
To start off, 2005 Hyundai Matrix is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,315 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 123 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Hyundai Matrix weights approximately 145 kg more than 1953 Buick 40.
Because 1953 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Hyundai Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Buick 40 (304 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Hyundai Matrix. (161 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1953 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Hyundai Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Buick 40 | 2005 Hyundai Matrix | |
Make | Buick | Hyundai |
Model | 40 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1953 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4315 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 304 Nm | 161 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 1810 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2610 mm |