1953 Buick 40 vs. 2006 Opel Tigra
To start off, 2006 Opel Tigra is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,315 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Buick 40 (123 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2006 Opel Tigra. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2006 Opel Tigra.
Because 1953 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Opel Tigra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Buick 40 (304 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Opel Tigra. (125 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1953 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Opel Tigra.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Buick 40 | 2006 Opel Tigra | |
Make | Buick | Opel |
Model | 40 | Tigra |
Year Released | 1953 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4315 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 304 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.9 mm | 73.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 80.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2500 mm |