1953 Buick 40 vs. 2007 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,315 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1953 Buick 40. (123 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1953 Buick 40.
Because 2007 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (338 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Buick 40. (304 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Buick 40 | 2007 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Buick | Mazda |
| Model | 40 | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4315 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 263 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 304 Nm | 338 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1940 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2880 mm |
