1953 Buick 40 vs. 2009 Volvo S40
To start off, 2009 Volvo S40 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,315 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Buick 40 (123 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2009 Volvo S40. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2009 Volvo S40.
Because 1953 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Buick 40 (304 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volvo S40. (241 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1953 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volvo S40.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Buick 40 | 2009 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Buick | Volvo |
Model | 40 | S40 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4315 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 304 Nm | 241 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2650 mm |