1953 Buick 40 vs. 2010 Fiat Doblo
To start off, 2010 Fiat Doblo is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,315 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Buick 40 (123 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2010 Fiat Doblo. (102 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2010 Fiat Doblo.
Because 1953 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Fiat Doblo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Buick 40 (304 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Fiat Doblo. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1953 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Fiat Doblo.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Buick 40 | 2010 Fiat Doblo | |
Make | Buick | Fiat |
Model | 40 | Doblo |
Year Released | 1953 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4315 cc | 1594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 304 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.9 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 78.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2570 mm |