1953 Buick 40 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Cruze
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Cruze is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,315 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Cruze (161 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1953 Buick 40. (123 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Cruze should accelerate faster than 1953 Buick 40.
Because 1953 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Cruze (360 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Buick 40. (304 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2012 Chevrolet Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Buick 40 | 2012 Chevrolet Cruze | |
Make | Buick | Chevrolet |
Model | 40 | Cruze |
Year Released | 1953 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4315 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 304 Nm | 360 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.9 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1788 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2685 mm |