1953 Chevrolet Corvette vs. 1981 Volvo 240
To start off, 1981 Volvo 240 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Chevrolet Corvette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Chevrolet Corvette would be higher. At 3,859 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Chevrolet Corvette is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Chevrolet Corvette (150 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1981 Volvo 240. (81 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Chevrolet Corvette should accelerate faster than 1981 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Volvo 240 weights approximately 77 kg more than 1953 Chevrolet Corvette.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Chevrolet Corvette | 1981 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Corvette | 240 |
Year Released | 1953 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3859 cc | 2383 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90.5 mm | 76.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 86.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 23.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1293 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 60 L |