1953 Chevrolet Corvette vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1981 Zastava 102 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Chevrolet Corvette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Chevrolet Corvette would be higher. At 3,859 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Chevrolet Corvette is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Chevrolet Corvette (150 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Chevrolet Corvette should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Chevrolet Corvette weights approximately 543 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Chevrolet Corvette is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Chevrolet Corvette. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Chevrolet Corvette | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Zastava |
| Model | Corvette | 102 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 3859 cc | 1115 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1293 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2160 mm |
