1953 Chevrolet Corvette vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Chevrolet Corvette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Chevrolet Corvette would be higher. At 3,859 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Chevrolet Corvette is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Chevrolet Corvette (150 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (81 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Chevrolet Corvette should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Chevrolet Corvette weights approximately 473 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Chevrolet Corvette | 2003 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Chevrolet | MCC |
| Model | Corvette | Smart |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3859 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1293 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2370 mm |
