1953 Chevrolet Corvette vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Chevrolet Corvette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Chevrolet Corvette would be higher. At 3,859 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Chevrolet Corvette is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Chevrolet Corvette (150 HP) has 80 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Chevrolet Corvette should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Chevrolet Corvette weights approximately 549 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Chevrolet Corvette | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Chevrolet | MCC |
| Model | Corvette | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 3859 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 70 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1293 kg | 744 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 1810 mm |
