1953 Chevrolet Corvette vs. 2006 Opel Tigra
To start off, 2006 Opel Tigra is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Chevrolet Corvette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Chevrolet Corvette would be higher. At 3,859 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Chevrolet Corvette is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Chevrolet Corvette (150 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2006 Opel Tigra. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Chevrolet Corvette should accelerate faster than 2006 Opel Tigra.
Because 1953 Chevrolet Corvette is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Chevrolet Corvette. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Opel Tigra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Chevrolet Corvette | 2006 Opel Tigra | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Opel |
| Model | Corvette | Tigra |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3859 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 90.5 mm | 73.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 80.6 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2500 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 45 L |
