1953 Chevrolet Corvette vs. 2010 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2010 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Chevrolet Corvette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Chevrolet Corvette would be higher. At 3,859 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Chevrolet Corvette is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Wrangler (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1953 Chevrolet Corvette. (150 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1953 Chevrolet Corvette. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 574 kg more than 1953 Chevrolet Corvette. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Chevrolet Corvette | 2010 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
Model | Corvette | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1953 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3859 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 205 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1293 kg | 1867 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4684 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2103 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 82 L |