1953 Citroen 2CV vs. 2006 Ford E-150
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 215 more horse power than 1953 Citroen 2CV. (10 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1953 Citroen 2CV.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 366 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Citroen 2CV. (22 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Citroen 2CV | 2006 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | 2CV | E-150 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 375 cc | 4604 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 10 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 22 Nm | 388 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 62 mm | 90 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 132 L |