1953 Fiat 1100 vs. 1965 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1965 Ford Mustang is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Fiat 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Fiat 1100 would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Mustang (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1953 Fiat 1100. (35 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1953 Fiat 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Mustang weights approximately 301 kg more than 1953 Fiat 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Fiat 1100 | 1965 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | 1100 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1953 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1089 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 1116 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2750 mm |