1953 Fiat 1100 vs. 1968 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1968 Ford Fairlane is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Fiat 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Fiat 1100 would be higher. At 6,550 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (213 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1953 Fiat 1100. (52 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1953 Fiat 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 755 kg more than 1953 Fiat 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Fiat 1100 | 1968 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | 1100 | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1088 cc | 6550 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 52 HP | 213 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 830 kg | 1585 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 5110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2960 mm |
