1953 Fiat 1400 vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Fiat 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Fiat 1400 would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (435 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 397 more horse power than 1953 Fiat 1400. (38 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1953 Fiat 1400.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (544 Nm) has 410 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Fiat 1400. (134 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Fiat 1400.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Fiat 1400 | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | 1400 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1953 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1901 cc | 4995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 435 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 544 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1860 mm |