1953 Fiat 1900 vs. 2003 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Fiat 1900. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Fiat 1900 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (390 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 311 more horse power than 1953 Fiat 1900. (79 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1953 Fiat 1900. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 432 kg more than 1953 Fiat 1900. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Fiat 1900 | 2003 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | 1900 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1953 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1901 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1662 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2580 mm |