1953 Fiat 1900 vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Fiat 1900. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Fiat 1900 would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Fiat 1900 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Clio (111 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1953 Fiat 1900. (79 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1953 Fiat 1900. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Fiat 1900 weights approximately 210 kg more than 2003 Renault Clio.
Because 1953 Fiat 1900 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Fiat 1900. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Fiat 1900 | 2003 Renault Clio | |
Make | Fiat | Renault |
Model | 1900 | Clio |
Year Released | 1953 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1901 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2480 mm |