1953 Ford 12 M vs. 1959 Triumph TR3
To start off, 1959 Triumph TR3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Triumph TR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Triumph TR3 (94 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1953 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Triumph TR3 should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Ford 12 M | 1959 Triumph TR3 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | 12 M | TR3 |
Year Released | 1953 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1171 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2240 mm |