1953 Ford 12 M vs. 1963 Rover 2000
To start off, 1963 Rover 2000 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,978 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Rover 2000 (91 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1953 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Rover 2000 should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Ford 12 M | 1963 Rover 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Rover |
| Model | 12 M | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 91 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1410 mm |
