1953 Ford 12 M vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,410 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste (74 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1953 Ford 12 M. (37 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Ford 12 M | 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | 12 M | Celeste |
Year Released | 1953 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1171 cc | 1410 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 74 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2350 mm |