1953 Ford 12 M vs. 1981 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1981 Toyota Celica is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,988 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Toyota Celica (148 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1953 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Ford 12 M | 1981 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | 12 M | Celica |
Year Released | 1953 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1320 mm |