1953 Ford 12 M vs. 1993 Jaguar XJ220
To start off, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 (542 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 505 more horse power than 1953 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Ford 12 M | 1993 Jaguar XJ220 | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | 12 M | XJ220 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1171 cc | 3498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 542 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 340 mm |
