1953 Ford 12 M vs. 1995 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1995 Mazda Midge is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,323 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda Midge (67 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1953 Ford 12 M. (37 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford 12 M.
Because 1953 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Ford 12 M | 1995 Mazda Midge | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | 12 M | Midge |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1171 cc | 1323 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1400 mm |
