1953 Ford 12 M vs. 2000 Jaguar XKA
To start off, 2000 Jaguar XKA is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKA (466 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 429 more horse power than 1953 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKA should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Ford 12 M | 2000 Jaguar XKA | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | 12 M | XKA |
Year Released | 1953 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1171 cc | 4399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 466 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2590 mm |