1953 Ford 12 M vs. 2000 Mitsubishi L 200
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi L 200 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,477 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi L 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mitsubishi L 200 (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1953 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi L 200 should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford 12 M.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi L 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi L 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Ford 12 M | 2000 Mitsubishi L 200 | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | 12 M | L 200 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2477 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1790 mm |