1953 Ford 12 M vs. 2000 Pontiac Trans Am
To start off, 2000 Pontiac Trans Am is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Pontiac Trans Am is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Pontiac Trans Am (148 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1953 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Pontiac Trans Am should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Ford 12 M | 2000 Pontiac Trans Am | |
| Make | Ford | Pontiac |
| Model | 12 M | Trans Am |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1171 cc | 5733 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2570 mm |
