1953 Ford 12 M vs. 2000 Renault Laguna
To start off, 2000 Renault Laguna is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Renault Laguna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Renault Laguna (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1953 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Renault Laguna should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford 12 M.
Because 1953 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault Laguna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Ford 12 M | 2000 Renault Laguna | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | 12 M | Laguna |
Year Released | 1953 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1450 mm |