1953 Ford 12 M vs. 2004 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,427 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Cherokee (144 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1953 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford 12 M.
Because 2004 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Ford 12 M | 2004 Jeep Cherokee | |
| Make | Ford | Jeep |
| Model | 12 M | Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1171 cc | 2427 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 144 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2660 mm |
