1953 Ford 12 M vs. 2004 Mazda B2300
To start off, 2004 Mazda B2300 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B2300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda B2300 (135 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1953 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B2300 should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Ford 12 M | 2004 Mazda B2300 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | 12 M | B2300 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1171 cc | 2261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 135 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2840 mm |
