1953 Ford 12 M vs. 2005 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2005 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (155 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1953 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Ford 12 M | 2005 Nissan Hardbody | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | 12 M | Hardbody |
Year Released | 1953 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |