1953 Ford 12 M vs. 2006 Ford Ka
To start off, 2006 Ford Ka is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,599 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ka (94 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1953 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford 12 M.
Because 1953 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Ford 12 M | 2006 Ford Ka | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | 12 M | Ka |
Year Released | 1953 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1171 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2450 mm |