1953 Ford 12 M vs. 2009 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2009 Ford Falcon is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Falcon (261 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 224 more horse power than 1953 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Ford Falcon has automatic transmission and 1953 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1953 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford Falcon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Ford 12 M | 2009 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | 12 M | Falcon |
Year Released | 1953 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 3983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 261 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4955 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1868 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1453 mm |