1953 Ford 12 M vs. 2009 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2009 Honda CR-V is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,353 cc, 2009 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Honda CR-V (164 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1953 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford 12 M.
Because 1953 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Ford 12 M | 2009 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | 12 M | CR-V |
Year Released | 1953 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1171 cc | 2353 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 164 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2630 mm |