1953 Ford 12 M vs. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 4,197 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover (391 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 354 more horse power than 1953 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford 12 M.
Because 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1953 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1953 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Ford 12 M | 2009 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Ford | Land Rover |
Model | 12 M | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1953 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1171 cc | 4197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 391 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 2200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2890 mm |