1953 Ford 12 M vs. 2010 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2010 Kia Cee'd is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,973 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cee'd is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cee'd (141 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1953 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford 12 M.
Because 1953 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cee'd, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Ford 12 M | 2010 Kia Cee'd | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | 12 M | Cee'd |
Year Released | 1953 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1973 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1460 mm |