1953 Ford 12 M vs. 2010 Toyota RAV4
To start off, 2010 Toyota RAV4 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Toyota RAV4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota RAV4 (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1953 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota RAV4 should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford 12 M.
Because 2010 Toyota RAV4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota RAV4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Toyota RAV4 has automatic transmission and 1953 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1953 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Toyota RAV4 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Ford 12 M | 2010 Toyota RAV4 | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | 12 M | RAV4 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1171 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 179 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1854 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2659 mm |