1953 Ford 12 M vs. 2011 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2011 Honda CR-Z is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Honda CR-Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Honda CR-Z (122 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1953 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Honda CR-Z should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford 12 M.
Because 1953 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Honda CR-Z, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Ford 12 M | 2011 Honda CR-Z | |
| Make | Ford | Honda |
| Model | 12 M | CR-Z |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1171 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4079 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2436 mm |
