1953 Ford 12 M vs. 2012 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2012 Fiat Croma is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Fiat Croma (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1953 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford 12 M.
Because 1953 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Ford 12 M | 2012 Fiat Croma | |
Make | Ford | Fiat |
Model | 12 M | Croma |
Year Released | 1953 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1171 cc | 1910 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2710 mm |