1953 Ford 12 M vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,460 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Clio (81 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1953 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford 12 M.
Because 1953 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Ford 12 M | 2012 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | 12 M | Clio |
Year Released | 1953 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1171 cc | 1460 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2580 mm |