1953 Ford 12 M vs. 2013 Honda Fit
To start off, 2013 Honda Fit is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Honda Fit is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Honda Fit (115 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1953 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Honda Fit should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford 12 M.
Because 1953 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Honda Fit, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Ford 12 M | 2013 Honda Fit | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | 12 M | Fit |
Year Released | 1953 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1171 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4105 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1525 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2500 mm |