1953 Ford Anglia vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford Anglia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford Anglia would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (150 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1953 Ford Anglia. (31 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford Anglia.
Because 1953 Ford Anglia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Ford Anglia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 3 (183 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Ford Anglia. (71 Nm @ 2150 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Ford Anglia.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Ford Anglia | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Anglia | 3 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1999 cc |
| Horse Power | 31 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 71 Nm | 183 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2150 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2650 mm |
