1953 Ford Consul vs. 2000 Mazda 626

To start off, 2000 Mazda 626 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford Consul. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford Consul would be higher. At 2,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mazda 626 (100 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1953 Ford Consul. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford Consul. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mazda 626 weights approximately 336 kg more than 1953 Ford Consul. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Mazda 626 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Ford Consul. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda 626 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mazda 626 (392 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Ford Consul. (100 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2000 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Ford Consul.

Compare all specifications:

1953 Ford Consul 2000 Mazda 626
Make Ford Mazda
Model Consul 626
Year Released 1953 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1508 cc 2496 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 40 HP 100 HP
Torque 100 Nm 392 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 4000 RPM
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1050 kg 1386 kg
Vehicle Length 4280 mm 4610 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1550 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2620 mm