1953 Ford Consul vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford Consul. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford Consul would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 317 more horse power than 1953 Ford Consul. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford Consul.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 430 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Ford Consul. (100 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Ford Consul.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Ford Consul | 2010 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Consul | UTE |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1508 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 100 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
