1953 Ford Crestline vs. 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe
To start off, 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Ford Crestline (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. (53 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Ford Crestline should accelerate faster than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Ford Crestline weights approximately 760 kg more than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Ford Crestline | 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe | |
| Make | Ford | MCC |
| Model | Crestline | Smart & Pulse City Coupe |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3929 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 1820 mm |
