1953 Ford Crestline vs. 1999 Honda CR-V
To start off, 1999 Honda CR-V is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Honda CR-V (148 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1953 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Honda CR-V weights approximately 20 kg more than 1953 Ford Crestline. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Ford Crestline | 1999 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Crestline | CR-V |
Year Released | 1953 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3929 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2620 mm |