1953 Ford Crestline vs. 2000 Saturn L
To start off, 2000 Saturn L is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Saturn L (135 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1953 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Saturn L should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Ford Crestline weights approximately 142 kg more than 2000 Saturn L.
Because 1953 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Saturn L, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Ford Crestline | 2000 Saturn L | |
Make | Ford | Saturn |
Model | Crestline | L |
Year Released | 1953 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3929 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1338 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2710 mm |